Traditionally, UCI performs the credit analysis process through the company’s own risk analysts, who study the processes and make a decision. Although they are professionals with extensive experience and knowledge of the company’s risk policies, the only manual analysis generates some limitations or consequences, such as
Delay in response: they invest a lot of time in review to approve or reject each credit application. Sometimes, it would take days to review a single case.
High competitiveness: unable to offer binding responses in real time, potential customers who make an application often end up signing with the competition.
Presence of subjectivity: the final decision was taken only by a team of people specialised in this area, but with feelings, prejudices; who, despite following some policies, contribute with subjectivity and this can mean that, in some cases, decisions were taken that are not totally neutral or objective. In addition, there have been occasions when real estate agents, who are their main clients, have asked to review transactions on the basis of approval of similar transactions, or have demanded an explanation of the reasons for rejection to justify it to the end client.
Lack of agility to adapt to change: changes in risk policies for mortgage approval are constantly being made based on client behavior or simply because of regulatory changes. Specialized agents need time to learn these new rules and be able to apply them in analysis.
Mortgage default: many of the approved mortgages have not been paid. Apparently, the mortgages were granted to people who did not meet all the requirements.
Faced with this situation, UCI wanted to create a dynamic system capable of evaluating applications in real time to pre-qualify its potential customers and thus reduce the number of defaults.